[ad_1]
[Warning: Potentially Triggering Content]
Diddy pushed again in opposition to one lady’s sexual assault lawsuit.
As we beforehand reported, the rapper is in some large authorized bother. It began when his former girlfriend Cassie filed and settled a lawsuit in opposition to the rapper in November, accusing him of years of abuse, rape, and trafficking. Since then, an increasing number of folks have come ahead with sexual harassment, abuse allegations, and extra in opposition to Diddy. Even the Division of Homeland Safety raided his properties in Los Angeles and Miami as a part of a intercourse trafficking investigation.
Related: Kesha Sends Diddy A Clear Message By Switching Up TiK ToK Lyrics During Coachella!
All through the scandal, the Dangerous Boy Data founder vehemently denied all the accusations. Now he needs to dismiss a few of the claims in one of many sexual assault circumstances. Which one? Right here’s the deal…
Final 12 months, a girl named Joi Dickerson-Neal sued Diddy. The sufferer claimed she met Diddy whereas attending Syracuse College in 1991. After showing in one among his music movies, Joi went to dinner with him. Sadly, issues rapidly become a nightmare for her. She alleged Diddy “deliberately drugged” her on the restaurant, then took her residence, and sexually assaulted her.
And that’s not all. Joi additional accused the music mogul of committing an act of “revenge porn,” a time period that didn’t exist through the ‘90s. She claimed he filmed the assault and shared the video with others. Diddy denied the allegations, saying the claims are “made up and never credible” as she filed the go well with within the closing hours of New York’s Grownup Survivors Act:
“This last-minute lawsuit is an instance of how a well-intentioned legislation will be turned on its head. Mr. Combs by no means assaulted her.”
Months later, Diddy’s tried out a brand new type of protection. In response to new paperwork obtained by TMZ on Friday, the file producer argued he can’t be sued for a few of the claims. Why? Sure legal guidelines didn’t even exist on the time the alleged assault occurred, he identified within the submitting! What the f**okay??! Moreover, Diddy says Joi can’t sue Dangerous Boy Data or Dangerous Boy Leisure as she’s making an attempt to do since they didn’t exist on the time of the alleged assault both.
As for the legal guidelines in query? Joi sued Diddy underneath the New York Providers for Victims of Human Trafficking Legislation. Nonetheless, his attorneys famous within the docs that the legislation wasn’t in impact till 2007 – roughly 16 years after the alleged incident. Diddy additional challenged her claims underneath the New York State Revenge Porn Legislation, which wasn’t codified till 2019, the New York Metropolis Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Safety Legislation, handed in 2000, and the 2016 NYC Revenge Porn Legislation.
The claims underneath these legal guidelines? The Making the Band alum needs them to be dismissed with prejudice! Ugh. Nonetheless, his legal professionals insisted this wasn’t an request for forgiveness. They preserve Diddy didn’t commit the alleged acts in opposition to Joi, together with sexual assault. It’s vital to notice his authorized crew isn’t arguing in opposition to the primary two counts – frequent legislation claims for assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional misery — because the timing of sure statutes being handed doesn’t apply to these claims.
We’ll should see how this wild new tactic performs out. What are your reactions, Perezcious readers? Sound OFF within the feedback beneath!
Should you or somebody you understand has skilled sexual violence and want to study extra about assets, take into account trying out https://www.rainn.org/resources.
[Image via Chris Connor/WENN, MEGA/WENN]
[ad_2]
Source link