[ad_1]
Sean “Diddy” Combs’ authorized crew has filed a movement to dismiss claims in a lawsuit accusing him of sexually assaulting a girl in 1991.
RELATED: Stevie J. Shares Viral Video Of “What A Real Diddy Party Looks Like” (WATCH)
Extra Particulars Relating to Diddy’s Reported Response To The Sexual Assault Lawsuit
In response to AP News, Combs’ authorized crew filed the movement on Friday, April 26. The music mogul’s authorized crew is reportedly asserting that Diddy can’t be sued for specific claims within the lawsuit as a result of “sure legal guidelines didn’t exist” when the incidents allegedly occurred in 1991.
Diddy’s authorized crew is reportedly asking for Joi Dickerson-Neal’s claims about “revenge porn and human trafficking” to be “dismissed with prejudice.”
CNN notes that Combs’ attorneys are persevering with to label Dickerson-Neal’s allegations “false, offensive, and salacious.” Moreover, Diddy’s attorneys are reportedly asking that “allegations towards Combs’ firm” be dismissed as properly. To notice, TMZ reviews that the request refers to Diddy’s firms, “Unhealthy Boy Information or Unhealthy Boy Leisure.”
Nevertheless, TMZ notes that Diddy’s crew has not filed to dismiss the primary “two counts” within the lawsuit. These claims allege Combs inflicted “assault,” battery, and “intentional infliction of emotional misery” on the plaintiff.
Extra Particulars Relating to The Lawsuit & Allegations
As The Shade Room beforehand reported, Dickerson-Neal filed the swimsuit towards Combs in November 2023. Moreover, the swimsuit was reportedly filed below New York’s Grownup Survivors Act.
On the time, it was reported that Dickerson-Neal accused Diddy of sexually assaulting her after a date in 1991. Diddy allegedly gave the girl a drug. Then, allegedly sexually assaulted her at a music studio.
In response to AP News, the girl accused Combs of recording the assault. Moreover, she alleged he shared the footage with pals.
In an preliminary response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the mogul reportedly denied the allegations. Moreover, they labeled the claims a “cash seize.”
“This last-minute lawsuit is an instance of how a well-intentioned legislation could be turned on its head. Ms. Dickerson’s 32-year-old story is made up and never credible. Mr. Combs by no means assaulted her, and she or he implicates firms that didn’t exist. That is purely a cash seize and nothing extra,” their assertion learn, per New York Post.
RELATED: REVOLT Reacts After Diddy Steps Down As Company Chairman Amid Assault Allegations
[ad_2]
Source link